April 27, 2026 — Draxis.ai today announced the TPRM Integration Surface, a major extension to its Third-Party Risk Management capability that turns the vendor record from a static governance artifact into a live map of every technical and operational touchpoint between the organization and its vendors. Paired with pre-staged containment playbooks, the Integration Surface collapses the time-to-contain window for a vendor breach from the industry-standard 36-plus hours down to under one.

The capability directly follows the launch of the Draxis TPRM Assessment Agent and completes the arc from vendor onboarding through live operations: the Assessment Agent decides whether to take the vendor on; the Integration Surface tracks what they actually do once they're in; and the containment playbooks get them out safely when something goes wrong.

The Problem: Vendor Data Lives in GRC, Integration Data Lives Everywhere Else

When a vendor is breached — Snowflake customer compromise, Okta support system, MOVEit, Sisense — the response pattern is painfully familiar:

  • Search Slack and email for "do we use this vendor?"
  • Ask IT to grep Okta and Entra ID for federated apps and service accounts
  • Ask SecOps to check firewall logs for traffic to and from the vendor's ASN
  • Ask engineering to dig through repos and 1Password for API keys
  • Ask Legal for the DPA to figure out what data was in scope
  • Ask Procurement who the vendor contact is and what the contractual notification SLA says

By the time the picture is assembled, the threat actor has moved. Vendor data sits in the GRC tool; integration data lives in the IdP, CASB, secrets manager, firewall, CMDB, and contracts. The Integration Surface is the join layer that makes all of it queryable as one thing.

How It Works

1. Every Vendor Gets a Live Integration Inventory

A new first-class entity, the IntegrationPoint, captures every discrete connection between a vendor and the organization: identities and service accounts, secrets and API keys, network paths and firewall rules, data flows with classifications and residency, SaaS-to-SaaS OAuth grants, endpoint agents, code dependencies and deploy keys, and communication channels. Each integration carries ownership, criticality, state, and type-specific metadata — not maintained by hand, but discovered by connectors.

2. Connector-Driven Discovery

The Tier 1 connector set — Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace, AWS, Azure, GCP, 1Password, AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault, GitHub, GitLab — covers roughly 80 percent of the integrations customers care about on day one. Tier 2 adds CASB/SSPM (Defender for Cloud Apps, Netskope, AppOmni, Adaptive Shield), network (Palo Alto, Fortinet, Cloudflare, Zscaler), and EDR/MDM (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Jamf, Intune). A vendor matcher resolves raw connector identifiers — OAuth client IDs, IPs, domains, service account names — back to vendor records with confidence scoring and a human-review queue for low-confidence matches.

3. Bidirectional Blast Radius

Two queries, both answered in under two seconds for the 99th-percentile vendor. Vendor → impact: pick a vendor, see every data element, system, and identity reachable through their integrations, ranked by sensitivity and privilege. Data → vendors: pick a data element and a time window, see every vendor with access, ranked by depth and recency. The second query is the breach-investigation headline — "we confirmed exfiltration of records 10,000 to 25,000; which vendors had read access to that table in the last 90 days?"

4. Pre-Staged Containment Playbooks

Every integration type has a templated revocation playbook: disable the SAML assignment and revoke sessions, rotate the API key and notify consumers, disable the VPN tunnel and block the vendor's CIDR at the perimeter. Templates auto-populate with the vendor's specific values — which Okta app, which vault reference, which firewall rule — so during an incident the responder is not searching for IDs. Playbooks regenerate whenever the underlying integration changes, export as PDF for tabletop exercises, and emit structured JSON the AI vCISO or an n8n workflow can consume directly.

5. Drift Detection

What the vendor said they'd access during onboarding is compared against what they actually touch. Undeclared integrations, scope creep (they asked for read, we observed writes), and dormant integrations (declared, still provisioned, zero activity for 90-plus days) surface as findings — each with a recommended action, from reassessment to decommissioning. Drift findings feed the AI vCISO so vendor risk conversations are grounded in reality, not attestations.

Example: Customer Support SaaS Breach

The Scenario

A customer support SaaS vendor discloses a breach via OAuth token theft from their CI system. Your team has 30 minutes before the press picks it up.

Without the Integration Surface

SecOps spends 36 hours assembling the picture: which Okta app, who has it, what scopes were granted, what data the vendor pulled over the last 30 days, what the contract says about notification, who to call. Most of that time is hunting, not deciding.

With the Integration Surface

Responder opens the vendor record. Sees: one SAML federation (Okta app ID, 47 users assigned), two OAuth grants from our SaaS to theirs (scopes: tickets:read, users:read), one webhook from us to them (signing key, vault reference), data flow of customer email and ticket history totaling approximately 180,000 records with EU data transferred via SCCs, the containment playbook with four steps and three deep-links at an estimated 12 minutes to execute, and the vendor's 24-hour breach notification SLA per contract. Time to contained: under an hour. That's the product.

Key Capabilities

  • Nine integration types covered — identity, secret, network, data flow, SaaS integration, endpoint agent, physical, code dependency, communication channel
  • Tier 1 connector library — Okta, Entra ID, Google Workspace, AWS, Azure, GCP, 1Password, AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault, GitHub, GitLab
  • Bidirectional blast radius — vendor → impact and data → vendors, both under 2 seconds for 99th-percentile vendors
  • Pre-staged containment playbooks — per integration subtype, auto-populated with vendor-specific values, exportable as PDF or JSON
  • Drift detection — undeclared integrations, scope creep, and dormant connections flagged as findings
  • Incident mode — vendor record switches to red-banner state that surfaces blast radius, playbooks, and emergency contacts above all other info
  • New "Data → Vendor" dashboard — pivot the view around a data element, see every vendor that can touch it with a sensitivity heat map
  • Framework alignment — SOC 2 CC9.2 / CC6.1, ISO 27001:2022 A.5.19–A.5.23, NIST CSF 2.0 GV.SC, GDPR Art. 28 / Art. 30, HIPAA §164.308(b), PCI DSS v4.0 12.8 / 12.9
  • Live ROPA generation — GDPR Article 30 records pulled from actual integration data, not spreadsheets from 2024
  • Vendor offboarding checklist — decommissioning plan generated automatically from the integration inventory
  • AI vCISO integration — every blast-radius query and containment plan is accessible programmatically to the AI vCISO for incident workflows

Why It Matters for vCISOs and Incident Responders

For vCISO firms, the Integration Surface turns vendor breach response from a multi-day scramble across half a dozen tools into a single-pane workflow that can be delivered to clients at scale. For incident responders and SOCs, the bidirectional blast radius collapses the investigative phase of a vendor incident into a single query. For GRC and privacy teams, the live integration inventory finally lets sub-processor lists, ROPAs, and vendor access reviews come from actual data instead of annual spreadsheet refreshes. And for security architects, the drift report is the first honest answer to the question "are our vendors doing what they said they'd do?"

"Every vendor breach story is the same story: a lot of running around to figure out what you already should have known. The Integration Surface makes the running around unnecessary — not by solving TPRM on paper, but by making the live connections between your environment and theirs a first-class thing you can query, rank, and cut off."
— Draxis.ai

Availability and Rollout

The TPRM Integration Surface is rolling out in phases. Phase 1, available today, ships the data model, the vendor → impact query, containment playbook templates for identity, secret, and network integration types, and connectors for Okta, Entra ID, and AWS. Phase 2 adds GitHub, 1Password, and Vault connectors, data → vendor queries, drift detection, and deeper AI vCISO integration. Phase 3 brings CASB/SSPM, network firewall connectors, incident mode UI, and automated ROPA generation. Phase 4 rounds out iPaaS, contracts/spend, and EDR/MDM connectors, and opens design work on assisted revocation.

From 36-hour scramble to one-hour response.

See what every one of your vendors actually touches — and what your team would do if one of them was breached tomorrow.

Get Early Access →

About Draxis.ai

Draxis.ai is a cyber risk intelligence platform that pulls Key Risk Indicators from the security controls organizations already run, ties them to the risks and business outcomes that matter, and surfaces the picture through dashboards and a panel of AI expert personas — led by the AI vCISO, alongside Privacy, Third-Party Risk, and Cyber Insurance experts. A persistent institutional memory learns from every stakeholder conversation so guidance compounds over time. Used by companies managing their own risk posture and by vCISO advisory firms scaling across multiple clients.

Media contact: press@draxis.ai