NIST CSF & MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
Every frame is drawn live in plain JavaScript on a canvas: hand-inked strokes, marker fills and line boil, all generated from code. Space plays or pauses, ← → seek, C toggles captions, F goes full screen.
Every frame is drawn live in plain JavaScript on a canvas: hand-inked strokes, marker fills and line boil, all generated from code. Space plays or pauses, ← → seek, C toggles captions, F goes full screen.
0:01 Auditors, regulators and underwriters each speak a different framework.
0:06 Draxis translates your live KRIs into all of them from day one, with no mapping project.
0:12 Each KRI maps to CIS safeguards, which crosswalk to NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001, DORA and NIS2.
0:23 On the attack side, controls are linked to MITRE ATT&CK techniques, so you can see which techniques you actually cover.
0:30 Every control gets an effectiveness verdict, strong, moderate or weak, with a confidence score and the reasoning behind it, and that verdict feeds the simulation engine.
0:41 Low-confidence mappings wait in your inbox for review, and your analysts’ edits are never overwritten.
0:48 It’s not a compliance project. It’s your real posture, in the language each audience speaks.
0:55 Draxis. Don’t wait for the breach to read the signal.
The CRSE documentation covers ATT&CK mappings, coverage, and how control effectiveness verdicts feed the simulations. The platform overview shows where controls sit among the five primitives.
Underwriters read the same verdicts. See Draxis for cyber insurers.
Overview · 1:04Read the Signal
Deep dive 1 · 1:00The KRI Pipeline
Deep dive 2 · 0:59The Cyber Risk Simulation Engine
Deep dive 3 · 0:59Early Warning & Draxis Axon
Deep dive 4 · 0:59The AI Security Advisor & Expert Panel
Deep dive 5 · 1:01The Partner Console for MSSPs
Deep dive 7 · 0:59The Draxis MCP Server