Draxis.ai

NIST CSF & MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Deep dive 6 of 7 · 1:00 · sound on
Don't wait for the breach to read the signal.Play · 60 seconds · sound on
0:00 / 1:00

Every frame is drawn live in plain JavaScript on a canvas: hand-inked strokes, marker fills and line boil, all generated from code. Space plays or pauses, ← → seek, C toggles captions, F goes full screen.

Transcript

0:01 Auditors, regulators and underwriters each speak a different framework.

0:06 Draxis translates your live KRIs into all of them from day one, with no mapping project.

0:12 Each KRI maps to CIS safeguards, which crosswalk to NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001, DORA and NIS2.

0:23 On the attack side, controls are linked to MITRE ATT&CK techniques, so you can see which techniques you actually cover.

0:30 Every control gets an effectiveness verdict, strong, moderate or weak, with a confidence score and the reasoning behind it, and that verdict feeds the simulation engine.

0:41 Low-confidence mappings wait in your inbox for review, and your analysts’ edits are never overwritten.

0:48 It’s not a compliance project. It’s your real posture, in the language each audience speaks.

0:55 Draxis. Don’t wait for the breach to read the signal.

Go deeper on framework and ATT&CK mapping

The CRSE documentation covers ATT&CK mappings, coverage, and how control effectiveness verdicts feed the simulations. The platform overview shows where controls sit among the five primitives.

Underwriters read the same verdicts. See Draxis for cyber insurers.

More explainer films

See all explainer films